BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:49:26 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
i didnt hear that but they own a station in this town(i think maybe the 
classic rock one too but they never say the parent company so who knows, a 
country station in a town aout 50 miles away, and a metal/hard rock station 
about an hour south, the one station moved down from 106.3 to 104.1 too and 
its anoying because they are back to their wimpy power level too, for a 
while we could pick it up clear up here but now i cant, oh yeah, this 
station in town bleeds terribly at the ends of the dial too.  Oh well its 
interesting, they are on 101.1 but you can be on about 103 and pick them up, 
same with this religious station(an actual church run station i think) is on 
92 90 or 89 or whatever, i cant get the omaha station on 92.3 without the 
station bleeding over and of course that sounds terrible,
yes i don't have a radio with a digital tuner, i have the little 5 inch tv 
bs from walmart that i regret

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Walt Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: Clear channel


> Phil -
>
> If they're private investors and not functioning as a publicly held
> corporation, they don't have to be identified.
>
> And you should hear a couple of the personalities on Clear Channel here in
> the Tampa Bay area ripping the company up one side and down the other over
> this sale. The fact that they've been doing this and getting away with it
> for a while now certainly indicates that the company is falling apart at 
> the
> seams--otherwise, these guys would be on the street faster than you can 
> give
> a set of call letters.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 5:24 PM
> Subject: Clear channel
>
>
> I wonder why Clear Channel is only saying that a group of private 
> investors
> have purchased the network?  They have to be operating under some company
> name so why isn't Clear Channel, on their own news broadcast, telling who
> bought them out?  I find that interesting.  Anybody hear anything more 
> than
> this about it?  They own about 8 stations in the Denver market.
>
> Phil. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2