Hi Simon, Well what can I say to this email, I think that you need to grow
very quickly and start acting your age, if you remember Simon, from the
past I have had dealings with you with one thing and another, so I have
your mailing address here and your full name and going back through the call
books for the last thirty years I haven't found you once in any book, so to
check this out I got a friend to go through these and not even he could find
an callsign for you. So what is the big deal, why will you not tell us
your call?. I like to know other peoples callsign so that if I am scanning
the bands and I hear a callsign that sounds familiar then I will either stop
and listen to them to who they are talking to and wait for a suitable pores
and brake in, if I don't know yours I cannot do this.
----- Original Message -----
From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: icom radios
> yes, I do regard it as aggravation, as you could so easily have just left
> it, when I said at first that I did not wish to give you my call, but you
> did not, you had to keep on and on about it, and then give out all this
> crap
> about not having one, which you are still doing.
> for the last time, I do have a call, but just do not wish to give it out
> to
> just anyone, which as I am not actually talking to you on air, I have
> every
> right to do, as I have also explained before, and again, rather than just
> leaving it at that, you had to keep going on. therefore, it is giving out
> aggravation, and bullying, as well as slander with all the nasty things
> you
> keep saying, rather than shutting your big nasty mouths.
>
> Simon
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 3:24 PM
> Subject: Re: icom radios
>
>
>> Simon:
>> get real, you were never prepared to give it since the first time someone
>> very nicely asked for the call sign.
>> There never has been any slander, bullying or aggrevation as you say from
>> anyone on here.
>> We all asked nicely at first, but when the call was not forth coming, we
>> naturally and quite correctly drew our own conclusions about your lack of
>> a
>> call sign.
>> Of course, if you simply give us the call you claim to have, we will all
>> be
>> nice and quite willing to help you and try to get you equipment you are
>> searching for.
>> But naturally, you will claim this request is bullying and causing you
>> great
>> amount of aggrevation.
>> I have never come across anyone who is so embarrassed about their radio
>> amateur call sign that they refuse to give it upon the asking.
>> The only ones i have come across who won't give it, are those who don't
>> have
>> it and are embarrassed because they couldn't pass the test.
>> Which is the more likely in your case....just study a little harder and
>> keep
>> trying, you'll get it one of these days.
>> 73
>> Colin, V A6BKX
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 5:03 AM
>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>
>>
>>> because I am not prepared to give these bullying wankers the
>>> satisfaction
>>> after the way they have carried on, no way!
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "andy m0ceg" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 11:37 AM
>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>>
>>>
>>> > Hello Simon, I thought you would of got yourself sorted out by now,
>>> > just
>>> > let us know your callsign and the aggravation might stop. Why is a
>>> > callsign so secret?????
>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 10:20 PM
>>> > Subject: Re: icom radios
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> dream on! you are the twisted one here, to enjoy giving out all this
>>> >> aggravation.
>>> >>
>>> >> Simon
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> >> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 9:33 PM
>>> >> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>> That's because he's not straight!!!
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >>> From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> >>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> >>> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:30 PM
>>> >>> Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] icom radios
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> that's what you think, my facts have always been strait, it is only
>>> >>>> tossers like you who always have to twist things round in order to
>> give
>>> >>>> out aggravation.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Simon
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >>>> From: "Walt Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> >>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> >>>> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 8:01 PM
>>> >>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> Guys like Simon can never keep their stories straight, since they
>> make
>>> >>>>> them
>>> >>>>> up as they go along.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >>>>> From: "hank smith" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> >>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:05 PM
>>> >>>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> yep noticed that as well
>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >>>>> From: "matt vansomething" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> >>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:54 PM
>>> >>>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>> And has anyone noticed he cant keep his story straight?
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> __________ NOD32 1.1768 (20060922) Information __________
>>> >>
>>> >> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>> >> http://www.eset.com
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1768 (20060922) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
|
