Simon:
get real, you were never prepared to give it since the first time someone
very nicely asked for the call sign.
There never has been any slander, bullying or aggrevation as you say from
anyone on here.
We all asked nicely at first, but when the call was not forth coming, we
naturally and quite correctly drew our own conclusions about your lack of a
call sign.
Of course, if you simply give us the call you claim to have, we will all be
nice and quite willing to help you and try to get you equipment you are
searching for.
But naturally, you will claim this request is bullying and causing you great
amount of aggrevation.
I have never come across anyone who is so embarrassed about their radio
amateur call sign that they refuse to give it upon the asking.
The only ones i have come across who won't give it, are those who don't have
it and are embarrassed because they couldn't pass the test.
Which is the more likely in your case....just study a little harder and keep
trying, you'll get it one of these days.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message -----
From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 5:03 AM
Subject: Re: icom radios
> because I am not prepared to give these bullying wankers the satisfaction
> after the way they have carried on, no way!
>
> Simon
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "andy m0ceg" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 11:37 AM
> Subject: Re: icom radios
>
>
> > Hello Simon, I thought you would of got yourself sorted out by now,
> > just
> > let us know your callsign and the aggravation might stop. Why is a
> > callsign so secret?????
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 10:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: icom radios
> >
> >
> >> dream on! you are the twisted one here, to enjoy giving out all this
> >> aggravation.
> >>
> >> Simon
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 9:33 PM
> >> Subject: Re: icom radios
> >>
> >>
> >>> That's because he's not straight!!!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:30 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] icom radios
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> that's what you think, my facts have always been strait, it is only
> >>>> tossers like you who always have to twist things round in order to
give
> >>>> out aggravation.
> >>>>
> >>>> Simon
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "Walt Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 8:01 PM
> >>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Guys like Simon can never keep their stories straight, since they
make
> >>>>> them
> >>>>> up as they go along.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> From: "hank smith" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:05 PM
> >>>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> yep noticed that as well
> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> From: "matt vansomething" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:54 PM
> >>>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> And has anyone noticed he cant keep his story straight?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> __________ NOD32 1.1768 (20060922) Information __________
> >>
> >> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> >> http://www.eset.com
> >>
> >>
> >
>
|
