hey, if the whole world went to Pot, i think there would be allot more peace
and good will...
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: alternative to Jaws....


> I suppose if they used real wood in my furniture, it would still be strong
> enough to hold that tube gear!  Basically, the whole country is going to
> pot!  Oh, no!  Now I sound like an old fart!
>
> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>
>
>
> At 04:54 PM 7/25/2006 -0600, you wrote:
> >Perhaps yo are right from the musicians point of view, but I did have
> >before I cleaned out my hd a truly scientific  blind study that refutes
> >that point of view.  Personally I still have a warm spot for the older
> >technology, however.
> >
> >
> >
> > >>> [log in to unmask] 7/25/2006 4:06 PM >>>
> >no no no!!!! the glow in the dark still has much supperior sound
> >quality no
> >matter what.
> >You can not get the same sound quality out of any transistorized
> >equipment.
> >You might come close, and certainly the smaller size, lack of
> >substantial
> >heat and feature rich components certainly make the non-tube stuff
> >easier,
> >cheaper and nicer to be around.
> >Any musician worth his sault will tell you that tube driven amplifiers
> >still
> >are far far supperior to transistorized amps.
> >The same is true with audio equipment such as stereos and preamps and
> >so on.
> >That said, of course, a 1948 am tube radio probably wont sound as good
> >as
> >your 15 dollar wallmart special bed side radio, but if you compare a
> >modern
> >tube amp, against a modern transistor amp, there is a huge difference.
> >tubes are warmer, have more head room, are cleaner, and can take much
> >more
> >abuse and knocking about then most transistorized components.
> >73
> >Colin, V A6BKX
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Brett Winchester" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 3:49 PM
> >Subject: Re: alternative to Jaws....
> >
> >
> > > My parents had a Magnavox console radio vintage 1948 or so with an
> >am
> > > shortwave plus phonograph with an optional Fm tuner which we did not
> > > have.  This PA fed a pair of elelectrostatic   speakers and had a lot
> >of
> > > volume.  My wife's fisher vintage 1982 with 120 watts per channel
> >would
> > > have to work to race the older radio.  Or perhaps I am a bit too
> > > nostalgic.  I have heard that the "glow in the dark" has a better
> >sound
> > > but think that has been more or less proven wrong now.  Ah well warm
> > > sound nice "real" cabinet work Like homemade ice cream  on a summer
> > > day.....
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >>> [log in to unmask] 7/25/2006 3:29 PM >>>
> > > if i were to guess, something between 45 and 60W?
> > > I know a pair of 6l6's in my guitar amp put out around 60W
> > > 73
> > > Colin, V A6BKX
> > >
>
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753
>