BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:29:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
I think tube radios sound better than anything out today. They're getting 
close, but, not quite there.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brett Winchester" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: alternative to Jaws....


> My parents had a Magnavox console radio vintage 1948 or so with an am
> shortwave plus phonograph with an optional Fm tuner which we did not
> have.  This PA fed a pair of elelectrostatic   speakers and had a lot of
> volume.  My wife's fisher vintage 1982 with 120 watts per channel would
> have to work to race the older radio.  Or perhaps I am a bit too
> nostalgic.  I have heard that the "glow in the dark" has a better sound
> but think that has been more or less proven wrong now.  Ah well warm
> sound nice "real" cabinet work Like homemade ice cream  on a summer
> day.....
>
>
>
>>>> [log in to unmask] 7/25/2006 3:29 PM >>>
> if i were to guess, something between 45 and 60W?
> I know a pair of 6l6's in my guitar amp put out around 60W
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2