BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Russ Kiehne <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:58:20 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Back in the 80's, 220 was very active here in the San Francisco bay area. 
Before they made the 220 band changes, the 223.62 repeater was very active. 
I also owned a shack master and used 220 as the control frequency.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: e-skip


> Well, I'm glad that 220 is getting some interest.  I never would have
> thought that was possible.  What drew up interest on 220?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Russ Kiehne wrote:
>
>> Yes, there's some activity.  One of the repeaters is linked to echolink.
>> There's a system on 220 called the condore connection.  It's a number of 
>> 220
>> repeaters linked together.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:08 AM
>> Subject: Re: e-skip
>>
>>
>> >I didn't think much of the 220 band, is it active in your area?  It sure
>> > isn't here, though we have some stuff on 220.  When I got the radio I
>> > didn't
>> > know what I was in for in terms of coverage and the fact that it had a
>> > whole
>> > other receiver!
>>
>
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2