BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:53:40 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (50 lines)
Right, and I've seen articlesin MRT Magazine, and there is trouble getting
commercial/government/other users interested in the 220-222 band, that
portion that was reallocated a while back.





On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, John Miller wrote:

> 220 is a good band but no one uses it. It's a real shame.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:24 PM
> Subject: Re: e-skip
>
>
> > Well, I'm glad that 220 is getting some interest.  I never would have
> > thought that was possible.  What drew up interest on 220?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Russ Kiehne wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, there's some activity.  One of the repeaters is linked to echolink.
> >> There's a system on 220 called the condore connection.  It's a number of
> >> 220
> >> repeaters linked together.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:08 AM
> >> Subject: Re: e-skip
> >>
> >>
> >> >I didn't think much of the 220 band, is it active in your area?  It sure
> >> > isn't here, though we have some stuff on 220.  When I got the radio I
> >> > didn't
> >> > know what I was in for in terms of coverage and the fact that it had a
> >> > whole
> >> > other receiver!
> >>
> >
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2