That I don't know.  My th79a quit working a couple of years ago.  I need to 
get a new ht.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Don Bishop" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: k1man


> Russ,
>
> ARe the k7ij repeaters still up?  Can't hear them down here in Merced of 
> course.  They certainly have an interesting history if you like that sort 
> of thing.
>
> But, don't think it's as bad as the 147.435 repeater, at least based on 
> what I've heard about that one.
>
> Don  W6SMB
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:54:39 -0800, Russ Kiehne wrote:
>
> How many of you remember this?
>
>   K7IJ Repeater Agreement
>   May 11, 1999
>   K7IJ Repeaters are to come back on the air under the following terms:
>   1. At all times that K7IJ repeaters are operating, there will be a
>   live,
>   real time control operator, listening to the communications. The
>   Control
>   Operator may be the licensee or a licensed operator chosen by the
>   licensee.
>   2. An audio stream will be configured so that the Commission may
>   monitor the
>   repeaters at any time the repeaters are on.
>   3. Stations coming on to the repeaters, if not known by the control
>   operator,
>   will be asked to identify at the beginning of their transmission, not
>   just
>   after ten minutes.
>   4. (a). If unlicensed stations come on to the repeaters, an
>   announcement will
>   be made by the Control Operator that the repeater does not welcome or
>   tolerate unlicensed users. In cases where unlicensed operators persist
>   in
>   communications over the repeater, the repeater will be turned off by
>   the
>   Control Operator and the matter reported to the Commission.
>   (b). When licensed stations are not abiding by Commission rules in
>   their operation on the repeaters, they will be asked to correct their
>   operation to comply with the Amateur rules. In cases where a licensed
>   operator persists in violating Commission rules, the Control Operator,
>   on a
>   case by case basis, may decide to (1) turn the repeater off; or (2)
>   leave the
>   repeater in operation and report the matter to the Commission.
>   (c). In both situations (a) and (b) above, the responsibility of the
>   licensee of K7IJ is subject to the provisions of Section 97.205(g) of
>   the
>   Commission's Rules relating to inadvertent retransmissions by
>   repeaters.
>   5. No further action will be taken against K7IJ or Blake Jenkins,
>   N6YSA, if
>   the repeaters are operated in accordance with these conditions.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kevin Kwan" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 12:43 PM
> Subject: Re: k1man
>
>
>> The reason glen is not listed on qrz is because of his obvious 
>> controversy
>> which got him kicked from that data base. In fact that was an on going
>> issue
>> with him when he found out he was removed from the data base. Of course
>> since every ham is listed there, to not be listed is embarrassing. If you
>> want another call to look up like that, try w6nut. The previous owner of
>> the
>> infamous 147-435 repeater in la. That repeater has been sited for several
>> violations. The sociopaths on that machine flaunt fcc rules everyday. 
>> It's
>> to the point that the repeater owner doesn't want the machine to run when
>> he's not listening. That still doesn't stop people from using the
>> frequency
>> though. They still pile up and jam each other on the input of the
>> repeater.
>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1463 (20060330) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>