Bob,

I could never figure out whether the Dog was serious, or whether he 
just said things to stir people up.  And you're right, he was some 
sort of TV technician.  More than that, he was a minority of one.

Steve

On Thursday 3/30/06 10:55 Bob Martin wrote:
>You folks will appreciate this... And it's accurate...
>
>I once had a dog fight with The Dog.  WI4B and I were talking on 40 meters
>about ways we were using the Apple IIe with our students.  Dog said there
>are some people whom he disliked and who shouldn't be on HAM radio.
>Included in his list were several minority groups and "blind people."  I
>think he is or was a television technician and held or holds an Extra Class
>License.
>
>Bob Martin
>
>
>Please visit http://www.wan-leatonks.net.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bob Moore - KA5ETA" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 10:27 AM
>Subject: Re: k1man
>
>
> > Talking about people that the rules do not apply to what happened to the
> > DOG?  I don't remember for sure but was the call n5dog?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Walt Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 7:35 AM
> > Subject: Re: k1man
> >
> >
> >> His problem has never, imo, been with his operating skills, per se, but =
> >> with his arrogant attitude that the rules about "broadcasting" and =
> >> commercial use of the bands don't apply to him.
> >>
> >>  ----- Original Message -----=20
> >>  From: Kevin Kwan=20
> >>  To: [log in to unmask]
> >>  Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 3:59 AM
> >>  Subject: k1man
> >>
> >>
> >>  regarding Glen Bastard, apparently he's behaving himself on the yl =
> >> system on
> >>  14.332. He helps out with net control activities and relays pertinent
> >>  information. I was surprised when I heard his call sign thrown around =
> >> during
> >>  the summer when I first became active on that frequency. It's neat to =
> >> hear
> >>  such a character exhibited good operator skills, since he's proven in =
> >> the
> >>  past to have none.
> >>
> >