BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: thinking of changing rigs
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Mar 2006 12:13:45 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
On Wednesday 3/8/06 10:51 John Miller wrote:
>we both can't believe a company as good as Kenwood put the antenna 
>connectors on pig tails on the 480 too.
That surprised me too, but I think they did it because of space 
considerations.  Also, it's easier to bend cables in a mobile 
environment than it would be if they were connected to rigid sockets 
on the back of the radio.  Remember that even though we use it as a 
base radio, the 480 was designed primarily as a mobile.

Steve

ATOM RSS1 RSS2