BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
T Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Jan 2006 21:06:02 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
    Ok, Colin.

That's what I thought, but wanted to be sure.

May be time to get a replacement computer for the shack.

Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: another thought on old ham shack computer and n3fjp


> it wouldn't, you would have to put in about 512MB of memory before you are
> going to notice a real difference in the over all performance.
> However, weather you notice it or not, the extra 128 of ram will help to
> keep the thing running with multiple applications running.
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 5:21 PM
> Subject: another thought on old ham shack computer and n3fjp
>
>
> > Hi, all.
> >
> > I forgot to mention in my last e-mail that the HP 566 runs on 128 megs
of
> > ram.  I tried yesterday to install 256 megs of ram, and it made no
> > noticeable difference.
> >
> > Best 73 and thanks again from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2