BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Clear channel
From:
Harvey <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:07:27 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (5 lines) 
I agree with you, but we are probably swapping tweetle-dee for tweetle-dumb 
in this case.  Now, the mega broadcasters are trying to get a foothold into 
satellite radio so they can ruin it as they did commercial radio.
Harvey

ATOM RSS1 RSS2