BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Walt Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:08:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Phil -

If they're private investors and not functioning as a publicly held 
corporation, they don't have to be identified.

And you should hear a couple of the personalities on Clear Channel here in 
the Tampa Bay area ripping the company up one side and down the other over 
this sale. The fact that they've been doing this and getting away with it 
for a while now certainly indicates that the company is falling apart at the 
seams--otherwise, these guys would be on the street faster than you can give 
a set of call letters.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 5:24 PM
Subject: Clear channel


I wonder why Clear Channel is only saying that a group of private investors
have purchased the network?  They have to be operating under some company
name so why isn't Clear Channel, on their own news broadcast, telling who
bought them out?  I find that interesting.  Anybody hear anything more than
this about it?  They own about 8 stations in the Denver market.

Phil.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2