BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Walt Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:39:01 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Apparently, these guys got caught only when their pink slips bounced back as 
undeliverable, which makes sense--it's the only way the FCC really has of 
knowing that the address in the database is invalid. I guess if you're an 
A-1 operator, you're okay. <g>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: A good reason to keep that address up-to-date


that's funny, the person who lived here before I did never changed his
mailing address either for a while, he had a tech license but never used it.
Anyway after his license expired for 6 months or so, he renewed it and did
that with the new address, I'm surprised they let it go through. He'll never
use it anyway, he never has and he was licensed before I was.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2