BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:31:29 -0400
In-Reply-To:
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Russ,

Using that PAL connector is my only real complaint with the 
radio.  You're right about the directionality, though.

Steve

On Wednesday 7/19/06 14:54 Russ Kiehne wrote:
>I wonder why they used a PAL connector?  The problem I see, you don't have
>the directivity like you do using a mw loop.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:45 AM
>Subject: Re: Eton E1 (was e-skip)
>
>
> > Russ,
> >
> > That's true, but I don't think that's a problem.  The radio seems to
> > receive quite well on MW using the whip antenna.  I'd like to try an
> > external antenna, but the radio uses a PAL connector and I'm not sure
> > where to get one.  They're quite common in Europe, but rarely used
> > here in the U.S.
> >
> > Steve

ATOM RSS1 RSS2