Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:00:17 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Well, I don't know how well the F6 does on 220, and that should tell you
all how quiet that band is here.
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Russ Kiehne wrote:
> Back in the 80's, 220 was very active here in the San Francisco bay area.
> Before they made the 220 band changes, the 223.62 repeater was very active.
> I also owned a shack master and used 220 as the control frequency.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:24 AM
> Subject: Re: e-skip
>
>
> > Well, I'm glad that 220 is getting some interest. I never would have
> > thought that was possible. What drew up interest on 220?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Russ Kiehne wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, there's some activity. One of the repeaters is linked to echolink.
> >> There's a system on 220 called the condore connection. It's a number of
> >> 220
> >> repeaters linked together.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:08 AM
> >> Subject: Re: e-skip
> >>
> >>
> >> >I didn't think much of the 220 band, is it active in your area? It sure
> >> > isn't here, though we have some stuff on 220. When I got the radio I
> >> > didn't
> >> > know what I was in for in terms of coverage and the fact that it had a
> >> > whole
> >> > other receiver!
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
|
|
|