Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:29:26 -0700 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
How about let us let the list admin decide what is relevant. Please,
lets not start this again. It is relevant because we're interested.
Also, it is sometimes interesting to discuss what frequencies these
services are on, whether or not they're combatable and so forth. Good
grief, if you don't like it, hit the delete key.
73s
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006,
Mike Garrett wrote:
> And XM radio is relevant to ham radio how?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 11:42 AM
> Subject: Re: BJS XM Radio needs our help
>
>
>> and we couldn't care less that you don't care. fact is, many of us do care
>> about XM, if you don't care, that's fine and I'm sure no one could
>> possibly
>> care any less so you might as well keep that to yourself.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Gary Glosenger" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 12:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: BJS XM Radio needs our help
>>
>>
>>> that is nice that you can afford to have xm radio.
>>> since i can not afford xm radio, i really do not care.
>>> gary glosenger, kb3kdl.
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|