BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:33:23 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
You know, it seems that whenever any kind of equipment is made to be 
accessible, it always seems to me that it is always the bottom of the 
barrel.

Anthony


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Webb" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] ICOM 746 PRO!!!


> Message-Id: 
> <[log in to unmask]>
>
> Pat wrote:
>   >I had a TS2000 and traded for a 746PRO.  (Involved some $$$s, also).
>   >The Icom isn't as accessible as the Kenwood.  But, many of the
>   >things that aren't acfcessible are things that you touch once and
>   >then pretty much forget.  You can adjust filter width easily and
>   >you won't hear the width spoken, but you will hear in the receiver
>   >what you have done.  Mode selection is easy and you can direct
>   >enter frequencies. My big problem with the TX2000 was, that if I
>   >didn't use it daily, I would forget what I needed to do!!  Getting
>   >old!!  nd, I tuned a 746 and decided that I far preferred the
>   >transceivers' receive performance.  And I owned a TS940 for years
>   >and still own a TS850 and still really the 850.  I believe, though,
>   >that the Icom receiver, being ten years newer than the Kenwood, is
>   >a better piece of equipment. Random thoughts.
> I echo Pat's observations./  WE had one at University
> hospital in NEW oRleans, it aws our lifeline out during
> Katrina.  IT's receiver is great!!!  WIth direct keypad
> entry etc. I found I wasn't that concerned about the speech
> which they didn't have installed.
> Btw if you get the 746 pro stay with a conventional power
> supply . I found that receiver performed much better
> downtown NEw ORleans even with all the qrm if I was using
> battery power or anything but that lousy switching supply.
> I've never met a switc hing supply for radio use that didn't
> suck btw.  TOo much noise!!!
>
> I think I've got a braille cheat sheet I started working on
> for the 746.  IF you decide to get one and are braille
> literate and would find it helpful let me know.
>
> 73 de nf5b
>
>
>
>
> Richard WEbb,
> Electric SPider Productions,
> Eads Tennessee
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/243 - Release Date: 1/27/2006
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2