BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 1 Apr 2006 23:19:36 -0700
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
I've never run across the term lid before except for the past few days on
this list...what does it stand for in the amateur radio context?
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: FCC Morse code announcement


> Matt,
>
> both points are absolutely true and especially getting through when
nothing
> else will.  I've proven that dozens of times.  However, I've been called
> lid many times but it has never been true, of course.
>
> Phil.
> K0NX
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2