 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:31:14 -0500 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I am one of those "show me" people when it comes to drug addicted people,
words are cheap, give me actions, not just for a day or two. I want to see
life changing, action!
-----Original Message-----
From: The Electronic Church [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Phil Scovell
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Decision To Make
Rhonda 2,
Gretchen says she cares for the children but there isn't very much evidence
to back up her claim. Her general argument is that she has ruined too much
of her life to make it work now for the kids. This unholy logic, therefore,
gives her license to do whatever she wants because her mom and dad and
youngest brother and his family, will take care of her children for her.
Meth is a horrible drug.
Phil.
|
|
|
