We were smarter then, so the assumption is, IMHO, warranted.
William
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:57:45 -0500, <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Not sure whether it does or not -- and I'm not claiming that Phil's
> making this point -- but I do want to point out that simply showing that
> some activity preceded agriculture doesn't mean that it's good for
> humans. We seem to sometimes make that assumption: We did it before the
> neolithic, therefore it's a natural or healthy activity.