Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 8 Mar 2006 16:29:01 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'm actually going to get a couple more of the TM271A's, 1 more for
backup/go kit/what ever needs it and I'm looking for a new packet radio
because what I'm using now isn't long for this world and I might just buy
another one for that, I'd rather get something cheaper like the ADI one or
something but I might just spring for that, I mean, if I get out of packet
just plug the mic in and I have 1 of the best 2 meter FM radios I've ever
had sitting right there.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frederick" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: Kenwood 271a, was ICOM 2720!!!
Hi
I have an Icom that is about 5 years old. It is almost totally in
accessible. I have thought of getting a different rig for 2 meters but I
spend my cash other places. At least my Kenwood HF rig is accessible.
God bless,
Mark WZ0K
God loves you!
My personal prayer book.
Add your prayer or pray for others at the following link.
http://prayerbook.homewithgod.com/cgi-bin/prayerbook/multi.pl?131961113534708:24:0
http://lists.topica.com/lists/funhamradio.
http://groups.google.com/group/funhamradio-list
http://funhamradio.bloki.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Webb" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: Kenwood 271a, was ICOM 2720!!!
> Message-Id:
> <[log in to unmask]>
>
> jOhn wrote:
> >no 2 m mobile is made better than the Kenwood TM-271A on the market
> >today or as long as I've been a ham. The thing is solid and a
> >workhorse besides for a lot of people I know that have them, I
> >recommend them to anyone. -----
> NOt familiar with this one. Hope it's better than my 261a I
> have in my van. INaccessible in any sense of the word, no
> way to independently (without sighted assistance) set ctcss
> tone etc. rEal pain in the backside.
>
> Mine also has a problem with transmit whenever it gets warm.
>
> It'd take that Icom 2720 over it, at least it worked.
>
> Btw the internal speakers on the 2720 weren't great as
> mentioned by another poster. I provided them a couple of
> those little radio shack mobile speakers for it, one for
> each side. THat improved the receive audio 100 percent.
>
>
>
> Richard WEbb,
> Electric SPider Productions,
> Eads Tennessee
>
>
|
|
|