Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:58:10 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<41F9580A.26859.40EA6301@localhost> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thank you David. As I expected, you gave a very nice presentation. You also
got me to investigate the 90.0.0.n range. It does appear the this range is a
myth and not truly reserved. Here is a link I ran into:
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/myths.htm
If anyone has more info on the 90.0.0.n range, please post. In particular,
how the myth get started, or a reference to where it is reserved would be
nice. If memory serves me, I originally found it in a Ziff-Davis
publication, as well as a few other places, but not a definitive source.
Peter
-----------------------------------------------
The NoSpin Group
[log in to unmask]
> -----Original Message-----
> The most common private ranges, defined by RFC 1918, are
>
> 10.x.x.x (1 Class A network)
> 172.16.x.x - 172.31.x.x (16 Class B networks)
> 192.168.x.x (256 Class C networks)
>
> APIPA (169.254.x.x (Class B)) is a special case defined
> elsewhere, as is
> (I believe) 192.0.2.x (Class C). I'm not sure where, or even
> if, 90.x.x.x
> is defined.
>
> David Gillett (no final e...)
The NOSPIN Group is now offering Free PC Tech
support at our newest website:
http://freepctech.com
|
|
|