BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:44:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
that's 1 radio I don't think I'll ever own, just because I don't like the 
face plate separate from the radio that you can't attach permanently to the 
radio and like the pig tales for antenna connectors on the back even less. I 
do see perhaps a TS-2000 in my future though if they still make it when I 
get the bills in order, seems like every time I make progress in that 
department something big goes wrong and kills it again.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kris Hickerson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: I'm Loosing It!!


>I agree, I like Kenwoods the best.  That 480 is one super radio.  It's the
> best one I've ever had!
>
> 73
> Kris
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2