PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 May 2007 14:32:48 -0500
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<op.tscbhcsii9dzqs@localhost>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
 And the English were fairly WELL nourished compared to some others, the
French for example.

Try the Japanese serfs. Even the Europeans thought they were tiny,
bow-legged little things. The current generation, fed on MacDonalds and
milk, is at least reaching towards normal stature. Imagine a diet worse than
modern ones.



When I think of the worst aspects of neolithic diets, I have  in my minds
> eye hoards of short, emaciated English serfs (not polite to call them
> slaves, though they were and are) living a life of drudgery and eating a
> gruel of weevily grains in their wretched climate.
> The weevils were the good part - fresh meat, eh?
>
> Shakespeare has an army hiding in a wheat field - modern historians
> explain this as tall wheat. They never mention IIRC that the soldiers were
> wee tiny fellows.
>
> William
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2