BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Richard Webb <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:11:18 000
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>

jOhn wrote:
   >no 2 m mobile is made better than the Kenwood TM-271A on the market
   >today or as long as I've been a ham. The thing is solid and a
   >workhorse besides for a lot of people I know that have them, I
   >recommend them to anyone. -----
NOt familiar with this one.  Hope it's better than my 261a I
have in my van.  INaccessible in any sense of the word, no
way to independently (without sighted assistance) set ctcss
tone etc.  rEal pain in the backside.

Mine also has a problem with transmit whenever it gets warm.

It'd take that Icom 2720 over it, at least it worked.

Btw the internal speakers on the 2720 weren't great as
mentioned by another poster.  I provided them a couple of
those little radio shack mobile speakers for it, one for
each side.  THat improved the receive audio 100 percent.



Richard WEbb,
Electric SPider Productions,
Eads Tennessee



ATOM RSS1 RSS2