I think if echolink was my only resort because of something like that I'd
find something else to do but I always find a way to get on the air. Not
sure what you have setup on 2 meters but you shouldn't bother anything like
that unless the antenna is inside.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Canazzi" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 12:28 AM
Subject: Re: echolink
Hi List,
Well, HF is fine if you are living on an estate somewhere and if you can
have room for the antennas. I would dearly like to have an estate some day
and be able to run high power and huge antennas. But while I certainly
haven't abandon HF and will use it when the cycle is high again, I feel Echo
Link is a viable alternative for poor people like me who are self-employed,
have no pensions, no health care and only a small lot on which to place
antennas.
...And as far as power, I get complaints from the members of my bedroom
community when I run 5 watts on 2 meters--saying I get into the kids guitar
amps and portable Ipods! This despite the fact that I routinely have my
station checked out by engineer types to see if everything is A OK and it
is! At least with Echo Link, I don't get any such complaints!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kallie Swanepoel" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: echolink
I agree on that one - Echo link provides artificial dx.
73
KALLIE ZS6KCS
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David W Wood
Sent: 18-01-2006 08:54 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: echolink
Bob and ALL
why not just turn on your rig and shout?!
The unpredictability of HF propagation is less challenging than the
problems of computers!
David
In message , Bob Humbert <[log in to unmask]> writes
>Scotty does a great job of explaining Echolink but Echolink just isn't
>as
>friendly as it could or should be. I have offered to pay anyone to set
up
>Echolink on my computer and to do a little hand holding with me as I
try to
>learn it to no avail. It's not really ham radio but until the sun
settles
>down and everyone turns on their HF rigs again it seems to be the only
game
>in town. Those of you who are good at it; is it as unfriendly as it
appears
>to be or are some of us just too dense to "get it". Has Freedom
Scientific
>written any special Jaws scripts for it and do they help?
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kevin Kwan" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 5:56 AM
>Subject: Re: echolink
>
>
>> If a station disconnects you go in to your jaw curser and near the
>> bottom
>> it
>> will list the last station that connected to you. I believe if
there's an
>> add on you can put on to echolink that keeps an electronic log so you
can
>> keep track of all your missed calls. It might even be a part of the
>> program
>> already for what I know. If so, it sure isn't speechfriendly.Also,
it's
>> been
>> brought to my atention by a list member that there are scripts you
can add
>> on to echolink available for a fee. I don't have the scripts but
maybe one
>> of these days I'll look in to it and see if it makes an improvement
>> working
>> with speech. At the moment it's kind of tricky but if you get use to
some
>> of
>> the keyboard short cuts, you can get around it fairly good. Of
course,
>> it's
>> still not a hundred percent however, considering the use I get from
>> echolink, it's working out pretty good.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:19 AM
>> Subject: Re: echolink
>>
>>
>> if they're connected to you just hit the spacebar or what ever your
>> PTT button is, you don't need to do anything else, if they
>> disconnect, you just have to find them on the list. I don't think
>> there's a way after they disconnect to figure out who called since I
>> don't use it hardly ever but there might be. I much rather actually
>> get on the air myself.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Fred Olver" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 6:37 AM
>> Subject: Re: echolink
>>
>>
>> No, guys, if a station out of the blue calls me, with my cursor not
>> being
>> on
>> the station calling, how do I call them back, understanding that I
have no
>> idea where they are on the list?
>>
>> Fred Olver n9bso
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Kevin Kwan" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:28 AM
>> Subject: Re: echolink
>>
>>
>>> I'm not understanding your question actually either. If you're
>>> asking about how to respond to a station connecting to your node,
>>> asuming you hear them
>>> connect, just press your space bar or which ever button you've
costumized
>>> for transmitting. If you're asking about how you can tell who they
are,
>>> as
>>> they're connected to you press alt three. You'll hear the person
call and
>>> first name.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Frederick" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:22 AM
>>> Subject: Re: echolink
>>>
>>>
>>> It depends what you mean by get back to them. Are you talking about
>>> how to transmit, or how to find the station to connect to them again
>>> latter?
>>> Mark WZ0K
>>> God loves you!
>>> My personal prayer book.
>>> Add your prayer or pray for others at the following link.
>>>
>> http://prayerbook.homewithgod.com/cgi-bin/prayerbook/multi.pl?1319611
>> 13534708:
>24:0
>>>
>>> http://lists.topica.com/lists/funhamradio.
>>>
>>> http://funhamradio.bloki.com
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Fred Olver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 3:01 PM
>>> Subject: echolink
>>>
>>>
>>>> Okay, Guys,
>>>>
>>>> So my puter is lying to me, anyway, that's what I think, been
>>>> getting audio reports today and appears I'm being heard, so now, a
>>>> station calls me, they're not on my screne, how do I get back to
>>>> them?
>>>>
>>>> Fred OLver n9bso
>>>>
>>
>> __________ NOD32 1.1200 (20050823) Information __________
>>
>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
--
David W Wood
|
