that actually is part of my problem. i am trying to
debate while opening boxes and helpping my very
faithful wife do the work of getting a household set
up. she came in a minute ago and said are you still on
the computer.
the cambodia thing might just open up some debate.
but, like i said, i think i'll try to hold off until i
can do it justice.
peter you are at least as good as deri in dishing it
out to me. i mean that as a compliment. i don't know
if i could take you both on at one time. i think deri
saw that you had things well in hand and had mercy on
me and did not gang up on me. i am very happy that you
came out of lurking mode.
--- "Kendall D. Corbett" <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Ken and Peter,
>
> I've really enjoyed reading your debate! Bring on
> the next topic! I'll
> join in if I have time!
>
>
> On 9/21/07, Peter Hunsberger
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/20/07, ken barber <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> > > well dr spencer is still reserching and still
> writing
> > > and still lecturing.
> >
> > Well sort of. He's pretty much stopped doing
> climate research, or at
> > least publishing any papers. Among other things
> he's gone on to
> > championing creationism...
> >
> > > i guess i just happen to look at
> > > his work with favor.
> > > i guess i am just very sceptical and have to
> look at
> > > things through the glasses of near 60 years of
> > > watching things happen.
> > > that does not make me right, it just makes me
> look at
> > > everything very much as a sceptic.
> >
> > FYI, I'm only a couple of years younger than you.
> I'm also a bit of a
> > contrarian, however, for the most part I prefer to
> stay private and I
> > don't have much time for public debate. The one
> thing that will draw
> > me out is when someone presents a position that is
> directly opposed to
> > the scientific research that I am familiar with.
> You may, somewhat
> > correctly, perceive that as an attack on your
> position, but realize
> > that it is also an attempt to validate my
> position; when I say show me
> > one scientific paper that contradicts my position
> I really do want to
> > know if such a thing exists...
> >
> > > i guess time will
> > > tell. in the meantime everyone should conserve
> just
> > > becouse it is the right thing to do even if one
> does
> > > not think that it is the right thing to do for
> the
> > > same reason that others think it is the right
> thing to
> > > do.
> >
> > Conservation is good. Knowing what to conserve is
> even better.
> >
> > > i'll probaBLY shift to something else that
> comes
> > > from living through something and that too will
> > > probably stir up some of you on the list. but,
> i'll
> > > wait a while on that. it came from visiting a
> friend
> > > after one of his 3 trips to cambodia, the last
> taking
> > > in his visits to "the killing fields." the
> memories
> > > came back quickly.
> >
> > --
> > Peter Hunsberger
> >
> > -----------------------
> >
> > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> list, go here:
> >
> >
>
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Kendall
>
> An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's
> redundant!)
>
> The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the
> unreasonable one
> persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
> Therefore, all progress
> depends on the unreasonable man.
>
> -George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> list, go here:
>
>
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
|
