 
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 |
| Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2006 15:05:43 -0500 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
Quoted-Printable |
| In-Reply-To: |
<op.s8omtby1i9dzqs@localhost> |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:52:13 -0500, William <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:31:38 -0400, Marco Benson
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Am I correct when I state that game and seafood
>> are the focal point of the diet, being the best lean meats available,
>> ...
>
> Most of us would consider lean meat to be dogfood. Fat is the way.
But not all of us. :-)
Question: If paleo man's diet was high fat, where did it come from?
What he had available was game and fish (lean meat), plants (vegetables,
no fat there), fruits (no fat), and nuts (high fat). Unless he just ate
the fatty parts of the game and fish and discarded the lean meat (which
seems unlikely), where did the "high fat" of the high fat diet come from?
--
Robert Kesterson
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
