BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: another thought on old ham shack computer and n3fjp
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Jan 2006 22:11:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (64 lines) 
windows 98 will use more than that it just on some computers, won't see more
than that, like my radio desk computer has 192 but only says 128, but if you
check the resources it will use all of it if I push it. my last desktop had
windows 98 SE and had 256 Megs and saw and used it all. I won't say what I
have now  lol.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob -- KA5ETA" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: another thought on old ham shack computer and n3fjp


Tom I have been told by people that knows a lot more than I do, that 98 will
not use more than 128 of memory.  So putting more memory in the computer
might help no matter how much you put in it.
I would think that the sound card is the problem that you are having.
----- Original Message -----
From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: another thought on old ham shack computer and n3fjp


>     Ok, Colin.
>
> That's what I thought, but wanted to be sure.
>
> May be time to get a replacement computer for the shack.
>
> Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: another thought on old ham shack computer and n3fjp
>
>
> > it wouldn't, you would have to put in about 512MB of memory before you
are
> > going to notice a real difference in the over all performance.
> > However, weather you notice it or not, the extra 128 of ram will help to
> > keep the thing running with multiple applications running.
> > 73
> > Colin, V A6BKX
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 5:21 PM
> > Subject: another thought on old ham shack computer and n3fjp
> >
> >
> > > Hi, all.
> > >
> > > I forgot to mention in my last e-mail that the HP 566 runs on 128 megs
> of
> > > ram.  I tried yesterday to install 256 megs of ram, and it made no
> > > noticeable difference.
> > >
> > > Best 73 and thanks again from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
> > >
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2