Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:47:37 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Nothing.
--Lou, K2LKK
At 08:49 AM 7/25/2005 -0400, you wrote:
>Although the cw portions of the sets of frequencies we have access too, if
>there is no requirement for cw, then what will keep either the fcc or the
>iaru from taking those frequencies allocated for cw?
>
>Fred Olver [log in to unmask]
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 11:06 PM
>Subject: Re: Fw: Re: fcc -- no more morse code?
>
>
> > It's not a hobby, it's a service. Somebody pointed that out on the list
> > earlier this week, but it bears repeating. The frequencies that we use
> > are
> > far too valuable to be set aside for a hobby. Don't forget it when
> > commenting to the FCC, or anyone else in the government.
> >
> > 73, de Lou K2LKK
> >
> > At 01:20 PM 7/24/2005 -0600, you wrote:
> >>I have been expecting this for several years. The digital modes have been
> >>taking over the CW bands anyhow. Additionally, the hobby isn't a hobby
> >>any
> >>more. It is called, selling new ham gear. But that's ok. The only
> >>people
> >>in the CW bands will be those of us who have learned the code. Once we
> >>die
> >>out, it will all be phone or digital movdes.
> >>
> >>Seventy-third,
> >>
> >>Phil,
> >>K0NX
> >
> > Louis Kim Kline
> > A.R.S. K2LKK
> > Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> > Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> > Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
|
|
|