LISTSERV - BLIND-HAMS Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	BLIND-HAMS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: exam
From:	[log in to unmask]
Reply To:	Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:54:37 -0500
Content-Type:	TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:	TEXT/PLAIN (29 lines)

Howard, this kind of thing is one of the reasons that I feel that the question
pool should not be available to people studying.

Tom


Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Howard Kaufman wrote:

> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:37:37 -0500
> From: Howard Kaufman <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators
>     <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: exam
>
> The head phones are legal, because the transmitter runs less than 100
> milowatts.  A low power FM station on that frequency isn't very
> possible for a couple of big reasons.
> 1. It is illegal, and you are in federal government reserved
> frequencies.  Can you say federal crime?
> 2.  Since it is illegal, nobody makes or will sell you a transmitter
> that sends out high fidelity FM audio in that frequency band.
> Didn't you learn what you studied? or did you just memorize the
> answers with out understanding?
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG