what you are saying about me is false none the less, so go screw.

Simon


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ham Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 4:31 AM
Subject: Re: icom radios


> Simon,
>
> The legal definition of slander is stating something about someone that 
> one
> knows is false.  Since you won't divulge your call, if you have one, 
> nobody
> is committing slander because nobody is typing any knowingly false
> statements.  Check with a barrister and get your facts straight.  Until 
> you
> do, get lost!
>
> Steve, K8SP
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 10:10 PM
> Subject: Re: icom radios
>
>
>> lets get the facts strait now, nothing has been proved at all, so it is
>> still  slander.
>> the only pane, is you and all those who keep giving out the aggravation,
>> either go pick on someone else, or better still, go find something else 
>> to
>> do with your life.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>
>>
>>>Their is no slander in truth.
>>>Pain maybe, but truth has been proven beyond a doubt here.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date: 9/19/2006
>>
>