PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Venkat Viswanathan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 02:16:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Carol Hanson's post (clipped for brevity):---


<<<<  ~~~I was able to get the USB port in the back of the
computer to work, so it's plugged in there now.  Is that the
difference between a 1.x port and a 2.0 port?
Thanks for all your help!  >>>>

USB 1.0, 1.1, 2.0 refer to "different speed" in data transfer. the higher the number the faster is the data transfer.for example USB 1.1 transfers data at about 12 Mb/second whereas the USB 2.0 transfers at about 480 Mb/sec.

The following URL gives some info on this:-

 http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=885

the slow "speed of painting of screen" is basically because of your 450 MHz  CPU  (as already pointed out by David Gillett)

so irrespective of the location of the USB port  ( front/back) it will be of one type only. either 1.0,or 1.1, or 2.0. or something still higher about which I have no knowledge. the other point is MOST (not all) USB 2.0 is backward compatible.in other words a USB 2.0 device can normally be plugged into USB 1.1 port but it will work but at a lesser speed.

HTH and good day---Venkat Viswanathan

         PCBUILD maintains hundreds of useful files for download
                     visit our download web page at:
                  http://freepctech.com/downloads.shtml

ATOM RSS1 RSS2