Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:28:10 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Todd, I seem to remember reading something about that too, but a brief
search for it yielded nothing. If anyone does find this paper, I would love to
read it, too.
Meanwhile, I did turn up this information, which, while not the work you are
looking for, is at least leaning in that direction.
_http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20040705/longevity.html_
(http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20040705/longevity.html)
Maddy Mason
Hudson Valley, NY
In a message dated 8/9/2005 4:59:03 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, Todd Moody
[log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask]) writes:
(from CR list)> Keep in mind that most
> of your "paleo-persons" only lived to be 25-35 years old.
> We are trying to "fool Mother Nature" into letting us live,
> in health, to 90 or longer.
Does anyone have the research, published within the last 4 or 5 years,
showing that these numbers are probably wrong? I can't find it.
|
|
|