Get a Pro-96, then that way if they ever do go digital, and even if they
upgrade to a project-25 control channel which is different from a Motorola
control channel you'll be ready for it.





On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, r.mcmanomy wrote:

> Well in that case I should go ahead and get a new scanner.
> But I am getting confused.
> I have one email saying Pro 95 and one say 96.
> I know people are going to have different opinions but I just want to make
> sure I get what I need to scan and something that with  or without a little
> learning I can use the scanner.
>
> Just because you can not see the stars does not mean you can not reach for
> them.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 4:46 PM
> Subject: Re: correction
>
>
> > Right, depending on the system you go to some have news of planned
> > upgrades and other news when you first open the data page that contain
> > system frequencies and things like that, and it sounds like they are
> > planni to go digital as th news updated that they had ordered radios which
> > would work on the syste's system there that is digital.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, r.mcmanomy wrote:
> >
> >> Is this Lafayette you are talking about?
> >> Just because you can not see the stars does not mean you can not reach
> >> for
> >> them.
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 4:39 PM
> >> Subject: correction
> >>
> >>
> >> > Hi everyone, I just checked radioreference.com, about that system in
> >> > Indiana, and they are analogue at present, but from the system news on
> >> > there it looks like they ahve future plans to go digital.
> >> >
> >>
> >
>