Well in that case I should go ahead and get a new scanner.
But I am getting confused.
I have one email saying Pro 95 and one say 96.
I know people are going to have different opinions but I just want to make
sure I get what I need to scan and something that with  or without a little
learning I can use the scanner.

Just because you can not see the stars does not mean you can not reach for
them.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: correction


> Right, depending on the system you go to some have news of planned
> upgrades and other news when you first open the data page that contain
> system frequencies and things like that, and it sounds like they are
> planni to go digital as th news updated that they had ordered radios which
> would work on the syste's system there that is digital.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, r.mcmanomy wrote:
>
>> Is this Lafayette you are talking about?
>> Just because you can not see the stars does not mean you can not reach
>> for
>> them.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 4:39 PM
>> Subject: correction
>>
>>
>> > Hi everyone, I just checked radioreference.com, about that system in
>> > Indiana, and they are analogue at present, but from the system news on
>> > there it looks like they ahve future plans to go digital.
>> >
>>
>