Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 22 May 2005 14:41:21 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> While it seems
> reasonable to say grass fed have a better omega
> profile they contain such a small amount of these
> fats that a few walnuts would skew it the entire
> other direction. Whereas you can take grain fed and
> skew it the other direction by a sardine.
This was good timing. I was going to sit down and
take a look at this tonight. I just force fed a 5
pound grass fed roast to the family. Cooked it
forever in the crockpot, seasoned it, and they still
hated it. If it was just me I was cooking for I could
deal with it, but it's obvious grass fed isn't going
to fly around here.
>Whereas you can take grain fed and
>skew it the other direction by a sardine.
Is the above really true, or is it a bit of an
exaggeration?? What are some of the other differences
besides N3's & N6's and higher amounts of saturated
fat in grain fed?
I'd love to see a side by side nutritional breakdown
of the two. Anyone know of anything like that on the
web?
Thanks
Mark
Discover Yahoo!
Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news and more. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/mobile.html
|
|
|