ya, we have space pretty close, I forgot about the baby monitors.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: OT cordless phone range question


Thanks John, that was going to be my next question about interference, and
I don't use my home phone that much, and don't know if I move if I'll even
bother with getting a home phone, but will have to see.    There are other
thigns following up to 2.4 GHZ like baby monitors and other thigns, and I
think that we even have space up there don't we?





On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, John Miller wrote:

> I would say, the higher in frequency you go, the less likely you are to be
> interfered with, now if you have a wireless computer network,  a 802.11B
> or
> G connection,  a 2.4 GHz phone might be limited a little, though I had no
> problem with this combination but know people who did have problems. How
> ever, I had an 802.11A set up for a couple months and my 900 MHz phone
> which
> works in the same range at that,  they just did not get along at all,  not
> 1
> little bit. Basically, if you have a wireless computer network, I'd avoid
> the frequencies that's on with a cordless phone to be careful, beyond
> that,
> I like my 5.8 GHz phone I have now as cordless phones go but am also
> trying
> to talk everyone else in the house to ditching the house phone and going
> all
> cell phone so I don't have to get their calls all the time. I do seem to
> get
> better range with this phone than I did with the 900 MHz phone for some
> reason, quite noticeably in fact but beyond that, they all seemed the
> same.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 4:43 PM
> Subject: Re: OT cordless phone range question
>
>
> Hi, I know the bands, but I just now am wondering about coverage.  I do
> not
> have terrain issues to worry about
>