What is the differents between the super II & III?





On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Russ Kiehne wrote:

> The superradio II is better than the III from all of the reports I've read.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 5:58 PM
> Subject: question
>
>
> >     In my oppinion, the Super III. radio is not quite as selective or as
> >
> > sensitive as the older Super II on AM.  In addition, I don't think the FM
> on
> >
> > the super III. is as good as the FM was on the older Super II.  My old
> Super
> >
> > II. was so good that I wore the darn thing out over the last 16 years or
> so.
> >
> > HI!  HI!
> >
> >
> >
> > But, to get back to Bob's question, I'd still say the Super III. is better
> >
> > than any similarly-priced run-of-the mill AM/FM radio you could get.
> >
> >
> >
> > On another note, I don't think the speaker and sound quality of the Super
> >
> > III. is as good as my older Super II.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> > From: "Bob Humbert" <
> >
> > [log in to unmask]>
> >
> >
> >
> > To: <
> >
> > [log in to unmask]>
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 3:21 PM
> >
> > Subject: Re: question
> >
> >
> >
> > > What do you think of it?  Is the sensitivity and selectivity any better
> >
> > than
> >
> > > the run of the mill portable radios?
> >
> > >
> >
>