BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
question
From:
Tom Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:58:56 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (56 lines) 
    In my oppinion, the Super III. radio is not quite as selective or as

sensitive as the older Super II on AM.  In addition, I don't think the FM on

the super III. is as good as the FM was on the older Super II.  My old Super

II. was so good that I wore the darn thing out over the last 16 years or so.

HI!  HI!



But, to get back to Bob's question, I'd still say the Super III. is better

than any similarly-priced run-of-the mill AM/FM radio you could get.



On another note, I don't think the speaker and sound quality of the Super

III. is as good as my older Super II.



Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ



----- Original Message -----

From: "Bob Humbert" <

[log in to unmask]>



To: <

[log in to unmask]>



Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 3:21 PM

Subject: Re: question



> What do you think of it?  Is the sensitivity and selectivity any better

than

> the run of the mill portable radios?

>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2