BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:18:09 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Don,

The FM section of the 2010 is pretty mediocre, so I'd have to say that the
Super Radio is much better on that part of the band.  Regarding AM, the
2010 isn't outstanding for sensitivity, but it's probably more selective in
the narrow position.  In the wide position, it probably has a better high
end response than the GE.  The other great plus for the 2010 is the
synchronous detection, which eliminates distortion caused by selective
fading.  In addition, the synchronous detection lets you select the upper
or lower sideband, which can be a big help- if you've got adjacent channel
interference.  Of course, the 2010 also covers the shortwave spectrum, and
has upper and lower sideband, which is irrelevant for the Super Radio.

Steve

On Monday 9/27/2004 16:16 Don Bishop wrote:

 >Maybe this is like comparing apples and oranges, but curious as to how it
 >compares to the Sony icf 2010.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2