BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 23:36:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Hi Don;

I can't point you to an article however, I can tell you that LI-ON batteries
are becoming the standard.
73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389


----- Original Message -----
From: "Donald L. Roberts" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 6:30 PM
Subject: Info requested on rechargeable batteries


> Hello,
>
> I am wondering whether anyone on this list can point me to an article
> which discusses in layman's terms the advantages and disadvantages of
> the major rechargeable battery types including but not limited to
> lithium ion, nickel metal hydride, nickel cadmium, jell cell and lead
> acid.
>
> I note that manufacturers of cell phones are increasingly going to
> lithium ion batteries; yet my  Victor classic plus daisy player uses
> nickel cads.  So I really want to learn the pros and cons of each type.
>
> And, while we are at it, why do manufacturers like Freedom Scientific
> and Humanware insist on using batteries which are not user replaceable.
> I would hope there is some justification for this, not just because it
> means a quick buck.Thanks.
>
> Don Roberts
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.16/83 - Release Date: 8/26/2005
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2