BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 10 Jul 2005 20:22:17 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (83 lines)
Yes, and if you get the right inversion layer you'll be quite lucky not to be in
jail.  As someone about to become a licensed ham you really need to be
responsible for what you're doing.  The excuse that you think you can get by
with it without getting caught is poor practice at best.  Also, you've made all
these statements on an open internet forum and you never know who's monitoring
ham-related nets.

Tom


Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, tomi wrote:

> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:59:43 -0500
> From: tomi <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators
>     <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: exam
>
> hi
>
> yes, that is why when I move to an apartment I'll sendthem back to my
> father. Wouldnt want to get in to trouble because a person in an apartment
> says that this and this person was transmitting music. I am quit lucky to be
> in the woods.
>
> best 73:
>
> Tomi
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 7:49 PM
> Subject: Re: exam
>
>
> > ya, people get in trouble for having cordless phones form other countries
> > in
> > the US that are in the 2 meter band every now and then.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 8:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: exam
> >
> >
> > I think perhaps the head phones might have originally been perchased in
> > europe before coming to the US perhaps that is why the odd frequency.
> > That, in fact, at least in canada, falls directly into the public services
> > spectrum...such as city busing and other municiple services.
> > I have never heard of a 414 MHZ short range device on the market...all of
> > them are 46-49 and 900MHZ 2.4GHZ and above.
> > In places other then north america one can actually buy VHF chordless
> > phone
> > systems as well as VHF and UHF short range personal devices such as
> > wireless
> > head sets, chordless phones and audio vidio transmition devices...all of
> > course not FCC type accepted in the US.
> > 73
> > Colin, V A6BKX
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 6:31 PM
> > Subject: Re: exam
> >
> >
> >> Steve, I was under the impression that Toni was in the U.S. and had just
> > taken
> >> the tech test.  Toni, is that the case or are you outside the U.S.?
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >>
> >> Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> >> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
> >>
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2