Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 31 May 2005 18:46:04 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yes, but they would have to raise your taxes $5000 to pay for it, and when
a sufficient number of baby boomers went blind, the whole system would
collapse!
73, de Lou K2LKK
At 04:29 PM 5/30/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>I don't think competition has helped us. How about having the government
>take over Freedom Scientific and just give it to everyone who can use it.
>It would be cheaper for the tax payers in the long run. How much would a
>copy cost? fifty sense?
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 12:31 PM
>Subject: jfw
>
>
> > hi;
> > The thing that will make jfw almost impossible to replace is partly the
> > name
> > "job" access with speech. Thus most vocational agencies seem to latch on
> > to
> > jfw. It would be interesting to know what percentage of jfw sales are
> > private and what percentage are from individuals? I am left with the very
> > unscientific impression that window-eyes seems to deal with significantly
> > more individual purchases as opposed to agencies.
> > Rich
> >
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
|
|
|