BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Humbert <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 May 2005 16:29:00 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
I don't think competition has helped us.  How about having the government
take over Freedom Scientific and just give it to everyone who can use it.
It would be cheaper for the tax payers in the long run.  How much would a
copy cost? fifty sense?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 12:31 PM
Subject: jfw


> hi;
> The thing that will make jfw almost impossible to replace is partly the
> name
> "job" access with speech.  Thus most vocational agencies seem to latch on
> to
> jfw.  It would be interesting to know what percentage of jfw sales are
> private and what percentage are from individuals?  I am left with the very
> unscientific impression that window-eyes seems to deal with significantly
> more individual purchases as opposed to agencies.
> Rich
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2