 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Wed, 11 May 2005 15:09:20 -0700 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
They got him !!!! Thanks for the link!!! I'll shut up now. That's really
good news. Thanks to all who replied to my message.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: FCC
>I don't follow this stuff too close and I'm not going to defend the FCC,
>but
> I heard someone refer to this episode from the ARRL letter.
>
> A guy from Southern CA arrested for causingg interference.
>
> Here is the link:
>
> http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/05/0506/
>
> 73 Steve KW3A
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Humbert" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 12:51 PM
> Subject: FCC
>
>
>> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>>
>> ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C5560F.0532A330
>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="iso-8859-1"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>
>> Does anyone know for sure about any ham who has ever bin fined or jailed
>> =
>> by the FCC? I said before that I think that the FCC is a toothless =
>> paper tiger and no one commented on my remark. What goes on here in =
>> southern California is truly a joke and I'm wondering if the same is =
>> true around the country. I have heard about all of their fancy locating
>> =
>> equipment and how they have so much power but I frankly don't think they
>> =
>> give a d...m about ham radio frequency activities and that there is no =
>> real way to stop monsters like we have here. If I'm wrong or if other =
>> areas of the country are having better results with getting the FCC to =
>> rid the bands of ham radio terrorist I would like to hear about it. =
>> Many and I do mean many clubs and individuals have submitted written =
>> complaints to the FCC and for years now he just keeps thumbing his nose =
>> at any attempt to stop him. "Ignore him and he will eventually go =
>> away" is the way that everyone is treating the problem here now but that
>> =
>> just isn't right. That makes about as much sense as "ignore the cereal =
>> killer and he will eventually get tired of it and quit".
>> ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C5560F.0532A330
>> Content-Type: text/html;
>> charset="iso-8859-1"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>
>> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
>> <HTML><HEAD>
>> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
>> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=3DGENERATOR>
>> <STYLE></STYLE>
>> </HEAD>
>> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
>> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Does anyone know for sure about any ham who has ever
>> =
>> bin fined=20
>> or jailed by the FCC? I said before that I think that the FCC is a
>> =
>>
>> toothless paper tiger and no one commented on my remark. What goes
>> =
>> on here=20
>> in southern California is truly a joke and I'm wondering if the same is =
>> true=20
>> around the country. I have heard about all of their fancy locating
>> =
>>
>> equipment and how they have so much power but I frankly don't think they
>> =
>> give a=20
>> d...m about ham radio frequency activities and that there is no real way
>> =
>> to stop=20
>> monsters like we have here. If I'm wrong or if other areas of the =
>> country=20
>> are having better results with getting the FCC to rid the bands of ham =
>> radio=20
>> terrorist I would like to hear about it. Many and I do mean many =
>> clubs and=20
>> individuals have submitted written complaints to the FCC and for years =
>> now he=20
>> just keeps thumbing his nose at any attempt to stop =
>> him. =20
>> "Ignore him and he will eventually go away" is the way that everyone is =
>> treating=20
>> the problem here now but that just isn't right. That makes about =
>> as much=20
>> sense as "ignore the cereal killer and he will eventually get tired of =
>> it and=20
>> quit". </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>>
>> ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C5560F.0532A330--
>>
>>
>>
>
|
|
|
