Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BLIND-HAMS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BLIND-HAMS Home BLIND-HAMS Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Re: Kenwood H F Transceiver;
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:00:25 -0500
text/plain (18 lines)
In a base setup, I think having the head separate is more of a problem then
anything, especially for me, it would annoy me to no end but to each his
own.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: Kenwood H F Transceiver;


>I get great reports on the processor in my ts480.  I can't imagine a better
> radio, especially for the money.  You'd really have to try to damage that
> connecting cable.  As far as not being able to connect the control head to
> the front of the radio, why would you ever want to?  After running the
> radio for about five minutes, that seems about as useful as tits on a
> bull.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV