 
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 2 Dec 2004 22:02:53 -0500 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
You know what, please publish this comparison on this list as well.
I'm interested also.
73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Nathan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 9:54 PM
Subject: Kenwood Radio Comparison
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C4D8A0.588ED860
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> I read with interest the comments on this list about the TS-480. What I
> don't remember seeing was anyone who had sat down with both the TS-480 and
> the TS-2000 and who might comment on the relative merits of each. I would
> love to hear from anyone who has done this. Particularly I would like to
> hear how the receivers matched up, what is spoken on the 480 that is not
> on
> the 2000, how do the DSP implementations compare and so on? If anyone has
> sat down and compared them side by side, please write me, off list if you
> wish, and answer some of my questions.
>
> Thanks so much and very 73.
>
>
> Kevin :)
> Amateur Radio: K7RX
> Navy Marine Corps MARS: NNN0SHS
>
>
>
>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C4D8A0.588ED860
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Dus-ascii">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2180" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
> <BODY>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D737045002-03122004><FONT face=3D"Slashed Zero =
> Arial">I read with=20
> interest the comments on this list about the TS-480. What I don't =
> remember=20
> seeing was anyone who had sat down with both the TS-480 and the TS-2000 =
> and who=20
> might comment on the relative merits of each. I would love to hear =
> from=20
> anyone who has done this. Particularly I would like to hear how =
> the=20
> receivers matched up, what is spoken on the 480 that is not on the 2000, =
> how do=20
> the DSP implementations compare and so on? If anyone has sat =
> down and=20
> compared them side by side, please write me, off list if you wish, and =
> answer=20
> some of my questions.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D737045002-03122004><FONT=20
> face=3D"Slashed Zero Arial"></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D737045002-03122004><FONT face=3D"Slashed Zero =
> Arial">Thanks so=20
> much and very 73.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Slashed Zero Arial"></FONT> </DIV>
> <P><FONT size=3D2>Kevin :)<BR>Amateur Radio: K7RX<BR>Navy Marine =
> Corps=20
> MARS: <FONT face=3D"Slashed Zero Arial">NNN0SHS</FONT></FONT></P>
> <P><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </P>
> <DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C4D8A0.588ED860--
>
|
|
|
