Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 17:09:44 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252";
reply-type=original |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'm confused. If you want to use a large intenna why do you want a hand
held?
----- Origin
al Message -----
From: "Jerry Neufeld" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 1:04 PM
Subject: external antennas with handhelds
> Hello again folks.
>
> Moments ago, I finished a conversation with an electrical engineer who
> seems
> to know a lot about the design of current, multi-band handhelds. He tells
> me
> that, electronically, designers now have the ability to build broadband,
> output circuits that will accommodate spreads in frequency as wide as 50
> mhz
> to 500 mhz, thus allowing for any antenna that is close to 50 ohms and
> reasonably resonant. He echoed the comments of several people here,
> lamenting the rather fragil sma connectors, now on most of the modern
> equipment. His suggestion was to purchase a cable, the length to be
> specified by the customer, from a company that puts a sma connector at one
> end and a selectable connector at the other, the cable itself, apparently
> quite robust but rather thin and flexible. He's going to look for the name
> of this company and get back to me. I'll pass it along for anyone
> interested.
>
> Thanks to all who contributed to the discussion. I now feel a bit easier
> about attaching something a little more efficient than the bendable gadget
> that comes with the handheld.
>
> 73's.
>
> Jerry
>
|
|
|